{"id":1416,"date":"2016-10-03T17:36:50","date_gmt":"2016-10-03T22:36:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/?p=1416"},"modified":"2021-07-20T17:26:47","modified_gmt":"2021-07-20T22:26:47","slug":"the-off-kilter-dipole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/n5hrk-blog\/the-off-kilter-dipole\/","title":{"rendered":"The Off Kilter Dipole"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I couldn&#8217;t help it. A few days ago, I was looking for something else (a common pass time for me) and in the cabinet I opened, I saw the off center fed dipole that I built when I first got back into the hobby. I had it up at the old house. It was an attempt to have a physically smallish antenna that could operate on several bands. I used it for at least on ARRL Field Day. There were problems, most of which are not expected to have been with the design of the antenna \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>While I have not found a specific online source of the original instructions, I have found several essentially identical sources, so I will refer the reader to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=off+center+fed+dipole&amp;oq=off+center\">Google on the matter.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Basically, cut a wire to the full length of a half wave dipole for the lowest frequency desired, in my case 40 meters so a bit short of 66 feet, plus a foot or so working and tuning room. Instead of cutting it in the center, the design I chose had me cut it 14% off center, 42&#8242; 2-1\/4&#8243; and 23&#8242; 8-3\/4&#8243;. You connect the legs to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.radiowavz.com\/product\/1-4cf-balun\/8\">4:1 balun<\/a> and <em>voil\u00e0<\/em>, OCF dipole. Note the wording &#8220;14% from the center&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1421\" src=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877-576x1024.jpg\" alt=\"20161001_102212\" width=\"576\" height=\"1024\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877-576x1024.jpg 576w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877-169x300.jpg 169w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877-768x1365.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877-1200x2133.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102212-e1475532590877.jpg 1836w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s where the online information and what I was holding in my hand depart. As I write this, I have not carefully measured the legs of the antenna, but I strongly suspect that I may have cut the short leg not 14% from the <strong>center<\/strong> but 14% from the <strong>end<\/strong>. That leg of the antenna is significantly shorter than 23 feet and I really think it&#8217;s more likely about 9 feet, which would indeed be 14% from the end. Definitely a newbie sort of error. Turns out that 14% from the center is the same as 36% from one end, which most directions specify, rather than 14% from the center. Had I originally found instructions written that way, I may not have made that particular mistake. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>Now it gets maybe kinda weirder.<\/p>\n<p>I strung that antenna up Saturday morning. Well, very temporarily &#8220;up&#8221;, with one end anchored to the workshop door frame and the other to the Mule. The short end is nearest the camera.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102126.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1417\" src=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102126-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"20161001_102126\" width=\"840\" height=\"473\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102126-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102126-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102126-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161001_102126-1200x675.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I connected the RigExpert to it with an 18&#8243; jumper and did several SWR scans using it as a standalone unit.<\/p>\n<p>Turns out, the antenna appears to be tuned a little low, but it&#8217;s not so far off that it would be unusable, particularly with a tuner. On the low end of 20 meters, might not even need a tuner.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1418\" src=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf-1024x479.png\" alt=\"ofc-hf\" width=\"840\" height=\"393\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf-1024x479.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf-300x140.png 300w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf-768x359.png 768w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf-1200x562.png 1200w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ofc-hf.png 1361w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Those low SWR dips are just below 40, 20 and 15 meters.<\/p>\n<p>I think it&#8217;s funny that, at the time I was testing it on Saturday, I did not yet know about the 14%-from-the-wrong-point error I apparently made when I built the thing, so this didn&#8217;t seem to be off base at all.<\/p>\n<p>Scanning the whole range that the RigExpert can do reveals an even more surprising bit. From a vector analysis point of view, the antenna appears to work at 2:1 or better from about 70MHz up. I suspect real world results might not bear that out.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1419\" src=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all-1024x479.png\" alt=\"ocf-all\" width=\"840\" height=\"393\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all-1024x479.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all-300x140.png 300w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all-768x359.png 768w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all-1200x562.png 1200w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-all.png 1361w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This scan is a little rough because there are only 100 points on a plot covering a full 170MHz. Armed with the information I now have about this antenna, I think I want to set it up and scan it at higher resolution and see if I can learn enough to understand why it works at all. My intuition suggests that the high frequency response might be due to the one really short leg. I want to see exactly where that lowest SWR dip around 150MHz is and what relationship that has to the actual length of the short leg. I think the still reasonable response at lower frequencies may be related the antenna&#8217;s overall length and maybe harmonics of 7, 14 and 21 MHz.<\/p>\n<p>I do not yet fully understand the Smith chart, but this doesn&#8217;t look like one to learn on, at least not at 170MHz bandwidth.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1420\" src=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith-1024x479.png\" alt=\"ocf-smith\" width=\"840\" height=\"393\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith-1024x479.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith-300x140.png 300w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith-768x359.png 768w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith-1200x562.png 1200w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/ocf-smith.png 1361w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Unrelated to that, I also rearranged the equipment rack to accommodate a Mirage 160W VHF amplifier. The power supply I have for it is only 20 amperes, so it may not be up to the task. It is also missing the binding post nut.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161003_070448.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1422\" src=\"http:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161003_070448-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"20161003_070448\" width=\"840\" height=\"473\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161003_070448-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161003_070448-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161003_070448-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/20161003_070448-1200x675.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 840px) 100vw, 840px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>At first glance, I thought this was a 1\/4&#8243; x 28 tpi stud, but it turns out to be 6mm x 0.75 pitch. Once I have the power supply connected, I will try out the amp.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly enough, the thing pulls about 8 amps just sitting there. I am mildly suspicious.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I couldn&#8217;t help it. A few days ago, I was looking for something else (a common pass time for me) and in the cabinet I opened, I saw the off center fed dipole that I built when I first got back into the hobby. I had it up at the old house. It was an &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/n5hrk-blog\/the-off-kilter-dipole\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Off Kilter Dipole<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-n5hrk-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1416"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2294,"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1416\/revisions\/2294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.n5hrk.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}